Iulia et Piscis

Ego fabulam vobis narro. Fabula Iuli est et parvae filiae Iuli. nomen parvae filiae Iuli Iulia est. Iulia fortissima est, sed quoque stultissima est. 

Olim, Iulia ad periculosus mare iit. Magnum piscem videt. Ecce! Piscis magnus et pulcher est. Sed magnus piscis quoque ferox et periculosus est. 

Iulia prope piscem ambulat. Piscis vehementer grundit. Non in aqua iacet, sed in terra iacet.

Iulia “Eheu! Hercle!” dicit. 

“Hic piscis non in aqua est! Nonne hic piscis non laetus est!”

Iulia pisci pervenit. Subito Iulia salit.

Ιυλια “οιμοι! ἡ ψαρι με λαμβάνει!” λεγει.

Ιυλια φεύγει. Ιυλια φόβεται. 

“ἡ ψαρι με ἀπόλλυμει!”

Ιυλια φεύγει και “οιμοι! ἡ ψαρι κακός και πονηρός εστι!” λεγει.

Ιυλιυς, ὁ πατήρ, ακουει και βλεπει ὁ ψοφος Ιυλιην  λαμβάνω

“Ἐλθε!”

“Ναι! ἡ ψαρι με ἀπόλλυμει!”

“Μη ψροντις! Εγω δευρει!”

Ιυλιυσ ἡ ψαρι ἀπόλλυμει.   

Ευγε!

‘Her’ Poem

Maybe he likes me back. Maybe he loves me the way I love him. 

(He’s chest-heaving, knee-slapping, laugh-out-loud guffaws, head splayed backward, pearly whites glistening. He’s cheeky grins, floppy, staticky hair, sticking straight up like a balloon-tousled mane. He’s dimples, my favorite bedhead, scuffed Jordan 1’s, diehard Swiftie. He’s stupid pick-up lines, persistent five-o’-clock shadow, ears that stick out a little, reused and reclaimed dad jokes. He’s skinny, thin frame, a smile wars have been fought over, head tilted and tongue sticking out just so when he’s thinking. I study him like a Monet. He’s my Mona Lisa.)

He contemplates my hazy, muddy brown eyes like they’re something beautiful. (I’m shifty eyed, habitual daydreamer, dances like the multiverse collapses today. I’m frizzy French braids, hawkish nose and gaze, too-wide grin, laughs with uvula showing. I’m journals filled with him and his smile – his smile! – , perfect messes, markers and gel pens and Sharpies left uncapped – my desk, used tissues, the covers of my notebooks, covered in his monogram – , trail mix and cold showers. I’m unhealthy obsessions with Led Zeppelin, plant mom of seven cacti, seven pairs of socks, seven glasses frames, seven empty bags of Ruffles and Lay’s potato. He thinks I’m beautiful. Am I beautiful?)

I want to be beautiful. 

(I’m acne, constellations of dots and bumps, scabs and whiteheads and blackheads. I’m toothpaste on pimples, soaping down my face, homemade remedies. I’m skincare videos at two am, zoning out into space, dirty fingernails stabbing at my skin, peeling off layers of discomfort and pain and insecurities. I’m obscene amounts of skincare products, flinching when someone’s eyes shift from my eyes to my forehead. I’m ‘holy grail products’, crying because he’ll never like me if I keep looking like a toad, warts and bulging eyes and dark circles left as battle scars from nights unslept, wallowing in self-hate and desolation. 

I’m fat. I’m too-thick thighs, sausage fingers, squishy forearms, neck rolls. I’m chipmunk cheeks, plump midriff, ‘built like a brick’. I’m non-existent jawlines, flabby fistfuls of flesh when I sit. I hate the two that comes after the one, the reminder that I’m 30 pounds heavier than my skinny white friends. I’m spurts of motivation and living off of apples and eating small meals then endless snacking and chips and soda and candy. I’m wrappers lining my mattress, in my dresser, on the top shelf of my closet, under the desk, inside my pillowcase, in my brother’s room. I’m not that fat. I don’t get to feel sorry for myself when my BMI says otherwise. That doesn’t mean I have to like myself very much.

I’m thick eyebrows, peach fuzz, Super Mario ‘stache, unseemly clumps of long, BLACK hairs in my nether regions. I’m back hair, hairy knuckles, hairy toes, fuzzy bust, gorilla girl. I’m spiky thighs, prickly knees, spiny calves.

I’m slits for eyes, flat nose, double chin, too-thick lips, receding hairline. I’m ugly smiles, awkward posture, long face, horseface. I’m tan skin, greasy T-zone, short neck, braceface. I’m flat, stringy hair, deep dimples, no assets. I’m overly peppy, too loud, dirty jokes, iPad kid humor. I’m tall and lanky, never knows what to say, egoistic and self-loathing. I’m weak chins, round nostrils, uncool, Asian, nerd, geek, rot in hell. I’m fantasies, drowning myself in romance and poking fun at other couples, love is ‘ew’.)

Maybe he’ll bike past my house like he does her’s, memorizing the minute details and the lace trimmings and the orchids lining the driveway. 

(His front yard is stamped with touch-football tournaments, sack races, ‘race ya to the mailbox’, impromptu soccer games, climbing trees. His house is cozy, erupting, overflowing, filled to the brim with love, joy, children, fun, shouts, laughter, giggles, ‘squee’! His lawn is littered with water bottles, Capri-Sun’s, deflated soccer balls, a pair of basketball socks, a knee brace, half a muffin, a bill. His garden is filled with wilted tulips, trampled by the races to the pool, rounds and rounds of tag, freeze tag, hide and seek tag, ‘tag, you’re it!’, stargazing outdoors, midnight games of manhunt of the summer. Arid summer days, his window’s locked and bolted. On breezy, dreamy, misty summer nights, his window remains flung open, inviting stargazing and deep breaths and reading on the bay window. He’s seen me out there. He’s never said anything.)

Would he like me better if I looked more like her? 

(She’s perfect, glossed lips, oversized tees, scrunchies in her coily hair. She’s Converse high tops, bandeaus, creamy strips of silky skin in the ravine between her cropped, cropped top and her wide-leg jeans. She’s dark, hair the color of midnight, eyes huge and searching and enough to get lost in. She’s luscious lips, glorious legs for days, pearly whites, puns. She’s winky winks, dimpled smirks, red red tongues on pink lips. She’s Harry Styles and Friends, tea and Starbucks’ matcha – a matcha green tea with oat milk and heavy cream, 2 pumps of vanilla, 1 pump of hazelnut, sky-high sprays of whipped cream – , gymnastics and dancing on the barre, en pointe. She plays flute and she sings and she stars in a musical every year. She’s nothing like me.)

He’d like me if I looked like her. Who am I kidding? He’d never like someone like me. 

I want to be like her. I want to be like her. I want to be her. I want to bewanttobeher. Iwanttobeherwanttobeherwanttobewwantwantwantobe. 

Her. 

Cindy Sherman Essay


It comes as a surprise to some people that Andy Warhol was a gay man. Still, though he is best known for his pop art, such as ‘Campbell’s Soup Cans’ (1962), his works expressing his gay identity, like ‘Self-Portrait in Drag’ (1980) and ‘Sleep’ (1963) were nevertheless a statement in a time when homosexuality was criminalized. Artist Cindy Sherman credits Warhol as one of her influences; although her sexual identity does not shape her artistry, her art too acts as social commentary (Briar), trailblazing paths and setting examples for those of similar ideologies. The messages conveyed in Sherman’s artwork and efforts in activism challenge the norm and influence other creators.

When most people think of art, they think of aesthetic beauty, like shapes that mesh, or impressive examples of realism, or art that leaves the viewer feeling impressed. Postmodernism challenges this expectation head-on: practitioners of the postmodernist movement, such as Cindy Sherman, share the belief that art, tradition be damned, ought to exist as a form of expression and inspiration to change minds and teach lessons. The movement snubs the idea of beauty as priority, and prioritizes bold, thought-provoking motifs and never-before-done artistic decisions (Mulvey). 

Cindy Sherman’s Instagram posts are a wonderful example of how she adopts postmodernist concepts into her art. Since creating an Instagram account in 2017, she’s used the platform’s tools to explore the social construct that is ‘Instagram Perfection’: an angelic face and hourglass figure. By taking airbrushing and reshaping her selfies to the social media standard to the extreme, Sherman highlights the differences between inhuman perfection and inhuman monstrosity (Rockefeller). She raises the question: When does exaggerated perfection become alien? With the world becoming desensitized to issues like rises in plastic surgery and Photoshop on the regular, Sherman depicts how our imperfections make us human. This instance of Sherman confronting very real beauty standards is just one occurrence of her creating art which tackles social issues through monstrosity and works of the grotesque. Though messages and ideas are so often transferred through works of art like artwork, music, or film, Sherman confronts ideas that are considered the standard, like women’s worth or sex appeal being reflected in their youth, encouraging her viewers to think more deeply about concepts they’ve become accustomed to and to challenge ideas so prevalent in their lives. This advocacy against current, human biases and customs shapes Sherman as both an artist and activist, but her advocacy transfers outside of her artwork as well.

Scrolling through Sherman’s Instagram page, it’s easy to be distracted by the images of uncannily reconstructed faces, but her Instagram too acts as grounds for her advocacy. Her activism and support of marginalized groups take form in funds to support struggling artists through the pandemic; online petitions and links to articles about and for the Black Lives Matter movement; Instagram Story rants about abortion rights. She manages to use her 372,000 followers and verified status to educate enormous groups of people, remaining conscious of her immense success by fighting the sexual harassment, sexualization, and objectification of women in Hollywood, condemning violations of women’s rights in Iran, and auctioning off art in support of the queer, disabled, and colored communities (Mulvey). Sherman, though allotted the option to revel in fame and success, chose to take advantage of her social megaphone to speak out in support of others and give back. Still, despite Sherman’s efforts to use the scope of her success as tools to advocate for honorable causes, she’s faced plenty of criticism. 

Sherman adopting the concept of postmodernism into her work has acted as a driving force in encouraging discourse and free expression within the art world, but has also garnered criticism from critics in past and modern times. In previous decades, her work had been often condemned by working men and housewives deeming her work unladylike and improper, especially in discussion of themes like sexuality and feminism within her work (Rockefeller). Nevertheless, Sherman’s work has acted as an inspiration for a number of artists within the entertainment industry, in her medium and in her progressive ideals.

‘NXDE’ is a Korean-pop song performed and written by Korean girl group (G)-IDLE. “I’m born nude, and you’re the pervert,” the girls sing. ‘NXDE’ is a song about the sexualization of female idols, or members of Korean-pop groups, and the expectation for beautiful women to be airheads and for feminists to be man-haters. Though completely different from Cindy Sherman’s work in substance, ‘NXDE’ reflects many of the themes seen in Sherman’s work. Credited as ‘the original feminist photo artist’ (Tomkin), Sherman pioneered within the art industry by speaking out about violations of rights with her art, and revolutionized concepts of gender, the sexualization of women, and femininity as a social construct. In some ways, parts of the feminist movement sparked within interpretations of Sherman’s art, and this lit the match that culminated in a brilliant firework sequence that is the modern-day fight for equal rights. So, though ‘NXDE’ may not have been directly inspired by Cindy Sherman, considering the disparities in nationality and artistry, a movement with Sherman at the center of it, the initial marble in a long-winded Rube Goldberg machine, nevertheless influenced the creation of ‘NXDE’ greatly. Sherman touches the art and hearts of those all around the globe thanks to her beliefs and her challenging societal expectations.

Not only have Cindy Sherman’s works added to her efforts in advocacy along with her other charitable ventures, but her art has also inspired other artists in a number of industries, in sometimes intangible ways. The legacy she’s left by popularizing postmodernism, monstrosity in art, speaking out about controversies in her art, and using her platform for the better can be seen everywhere, even in the most unexpected ways. Viewers of her work can agree that the depth and artistic genius of her work is astounding, and it translates within her message, beliefs, and movement.

Instances of Power in ‘Flying Lessons’

Power comes with more than one definition and usage. This is anything but contrived; power and powerlessness encompass all things social, physical, and financial: The Truth About Sharks surrounds a power shift in authority and standing, in addition to the abuse and use of the same kind of power. Meanwhile, power in The Difficult Path is comprised of societal expectations, violence and intimidation, and education’s necessity. Yet, in Flying Lessons, a shift in power occurs in which a powerless character causes another character’s gaining of power, and emphasizes youth’s power. As can be seen, characters’ power or powerlessness doesn’t necessarily define their actions or being, and power shifts occur in varied ways.

The Truth About Sharks encircles a powerless character, Beth, and how she gains power and confidence by standing up to an authority figure. The story opens with a security guard named Madge P. Groton bearing physical and social power over the story’s protagonist, Beth. Madge at first intimidates Beth: not only is she a hulking woman, she wields a position of authority. She’s described by Beth’s narration as stocky and stern, with “frigid, gray eyes” (pg. 34). Beth narrates the violence and threats Madge imposes upon her, as well as the intense fear Beth feels upon these occurrences. Because of her ‘security guard’ title and massive size and strength, Madge’s physical and social power was at an imbalance with Beth’s as a common civilian. On the other hand, when Beth realizes the injustices she has suffered and gains the confidence to stand up to Madge, Beth gains power over her. As a customer, Beth holds social power over Madge. And yet, while Madge had abused her power, forcing violence and inappropriate behavior onto Beth, Beth uses her power to do what she considers right, and furthermore gains the confidence to stand up for herself and her own integrity as well as the dignity and respect of all women: “…but there was something shining in my face that I could feel – something, Mom said, that money could not buy – empowerment… and even though Aunt Cassie had questioned my innocence, when I told her about Officer Brennerman, she turned pink and flustered and hurried away. I even took Uncle Al aside and told him that the joke he told before dinner offended me and all women through the ages and he apologized ‘ (pg. 46). This demonstrates how, even in a single story, characters’ power doesn’t necessarily define and map out their actions. Further, this applies elsewhere in regards to power, as in The Difficult Path.

The Difficult Path, like The Truth About Sharks, demonstrates the different forms power shifts can appear in, but also further demonstrates the many forms power itself can appear in. To start with, the power shift in The Difficult Path occurs with the protagonist, Lingsi, gaining will over herself and her future. Already, this newly gained power appears in a form much unlike that shown in The Truth About Sharks. Other power dynamics too play into the story’s representation of power  and later power shift: Lingsi, but a slave girl, is revealed to have a future as the housewife of her social superior mapped out for her. And yet, she can hardly fight these expectations, with her ‘owners’ and ‘future in-laws’ holding extensive wealth and social presence over her role as but a subordinate. Further, pirates are introduced into the story, and using violence, they wreak havoc upon the land. In this instance, power appears in the form of physical power and violence, though the pirates abuse their violence, intimidation, and infamy, causing much distress and injury. Still, despite everything, Tianyi is portrayed in a favorable light, and the author implies the sympathy and identifying with the readers should feel for her, despite her abuse of power. In a final instance, Lingsi, literate and a ravenous scholar, refuses Tianyi’s orders for her to return home, wishing to escape her servitude and sure future, by demonstrating her abilities to read. Here, Lingsi holds a certain power over Tianyi: she has an education, of which Tianyi is shown to greatly value and yearn for – and by encouraging Lingsi to teach her how to read, grants Lingsi authority in a student-teacher relationship. Thus, Lingsi’s power towards the end of The Difficult Path is her literacy, and along with demonstrating a form of power, this teaches us an important lesson: learning gives you wings. Even more so, The Difficult Path finishes up with a thoughtful statement with a lesson within its words: “But my head is raised and I can’t help but smile. For while the path before me might be difficult, it will be my own,” (pg. 39), reiterating the power within self-sufficiency.

Like The Difficult Path, Flying Lessons tucks its examination of power dynamics and shifts within thought-provoking streams of consciousness. Even as Flying Lessons explores the cagedness of old age and lack of experience (which do come into play in regards to power), power is nevertheless explored, encompassing interpretations other from the previously mentioned The Truth About Sharks and The Difficult Path. Flying Lessons follows Santosh and his grandmother, Nani, as she encourages him to come out of his bubble of academics and books and to seek real-life experiences outside of his comfort zones. Through Nani’s relentless encouragement, Santosh exits his comfort zone, finding merit in making friends and forming connections, and in this way gains social prowess and confidence. But still: Santosh’s gaining of power was not shifted from Nani, despite her encouragement: in the aspect of living his youthful life to the fullest with his newfound confidence and fiercely optimistic outlook on life, she is entirely without power, having lived her days through and now at a wrinkly, pruned (though admittedly still very much fabulous) stage. Despite her being a catalyst for Santosh’s willingness to ‘seize the day’, Nani is still powerless, a “caged bird” (pg. 157) if you will: “‘Money! What good is money to a bird in a cage?’” (pg. 140) And where Nani acts as a support beam and encouragement to Santosh, she herself lacked such privilege, her husband valuing money and awards, insisting their time has passed and discouraging her wish to ‘live’. Nani as a mentor to Santosh empowers him, an opportunity that she’d missed out on previously. All throughout the story, Nani is held back by her age, though Santosh is chained to but himself and his unwillingness to change. At the end, Santosh’s issues are resolved, he flies free, unchained from his own discouragement, reveling in his new power. Nani’s age is irreversible; she’s powerless to resolve it. So, as Nani assists in Santosh’s gaining of power, she herself is powerless. This therefore demonstrates another form of power shift, and how age is a power to be used. The reader learns how important it is to truly ‘live’ when youth is within someone, and how quickly its departure leaves them powerless.

Though The Truth About Sharks, The Difficult Path, and Flying Lessons each encircle vastly different subjects and teach vastly different lessons, they are similar in the way power is central in their themes, growth of characters, and character interactions. Still, power doesn’t just mean strength or ability, it can also mean authority and the shifts in authority, as in The Truth About Sharks; violence, education, and self-sufficiency, as shown in The Difficult Path; or even youth and the dynamics between powerlessness and power, as can be seen in Flying Lessons. Power and powerlessness are all-encompassing topics, and there is so much to be learned from the different demonstrations of power in writing.

Plessy V. Ferguson Essay

1896 marked a Supreme Court Case that shifted the preconception of the U.S. and its discussion and acting on of race and segregation. The Plessy v. Ferguson U.S. Supreme Court decision legalized the practice of racial segregation and established the “separate but equal” doctrine, giving rise to the start of Jim Crow legislation being written into law. Even so, the discrimination against and mistreatment of African American people lasted from even before the case took place, stemming from white supremacist and imperialist ideals.

Imperialist ideals and negative portrayal of black people caused a differentiation between and therefore separation of the races. In other words, a racial caste system was put into place. Throughout the period of time prior to the Jim Crow Era and following the enslavement of African Americans known as the Reconstruction Era, black men were characterized as wild and immoral beasts who raped virtuous white women, while black women were portrayed as crass, wild seductresses of young, naive white men. This distinction between white people as God-fearing, pious people and black people as bestial, subhuman animals contributed to the scientific racism during that era, or belief in the natural designation of white people as superior to all other races.

Within the case leading up to the Plessy v. Ferguson Supreme Court Decision, Homer Plessy, an activist for African American citizens’ rights was accused of violating the ‘Separate Car Act’  and faced imprisonment. The ‘Separate Car Act’ ruled that railway cars were to be segregated by race, or than ‘no person or persons shall be permitted to occupy seats in coaches other than the ones assigned to them, on account of the race they belong to’, and that upon any rejection of such ruling, ‘[officers] shall have power to refuse to carry such passenger on his train’. To violate this ruling, Plessy, a white-presenting Black Creole of seven-eighths white heritage and one-eighths black heritage, bought a ticket to a white railway car without facing refusal, and was only arrested upon yelling that he himself was black. Despite being nearly fully white in heritage and white-passing, this African ‘taint’ upon his ancestry caused him to be arrested. This expresses the white-supremacist thinking of themselves being superior and black blood being inferior and tarnishing a white appearance. 

The distinction set between the races and therefore white supremacist thinking caused lynching and the mistreatment of African American people within segregated spaces. White supremacist groups such as the Ku Klux Klan used violence to attack and intimidate African Americans and their supporters.White supremacist groups, or in other words, terrorist groups, lynched and tortured many black people as a form of ‘administering justice’. The lynching, or putting to death (typically the hanging of an individual by a mob), of black men was usually enacted as a response to the accusations of said black men’s raping and murdering of white women. The accusations rose from the negative portrayal of black men and systemic biases at the time. Thousands of innocent civil rights activists’ lives were lost through lynching and other forms of violence. 

Outside of violence and murder present leading up to the Plessy v. Ferguson Supreme Court Decision, African Americans faced several forms of discrimination and segregation even prior to the formal enaction of Jim Crow laws. Not only were segregated public spaces blatant in qualitative differences of passenger coaches, utilities, and such, the Black Codes, a set of laws, were put into place, restricting the rights of former slaves, and later all African Americans, despite constitutional amendments that set African American peoples’ inalienable rights into stone.  Leading up to the Jim Crow era, black people faced substandard healthcare, substandard education, and ‘daily humiliations’ like being waited on last or being forced to make way for white people at crosswalks. During the Jim Crow era, the general poverty and general low educational levels of African Americans were used to justify their lack of rights, whether constitutional or political (black people were excluded from the Democratic party, which was the power that instituted Jim Crow laws). In other words, African American people were segregated against in many blatant, humiliating ways even prior to the Jim Crow era, and this segregation was too even justified prior to the Jim Crow era. 

While the Plessy v. Ferguson Supreme Court decision itself gave rise to legalized segregation and Jim Crow ideals and legislation, the discrimination against and mistreatment of African Americans had long existed, even after the abolition of slavery and throughout the Reconstruction Era. This discrimination and mistreatment was inspired by the white supremacist and imperialist ideals of much of the white population at the time, too inspiring the Plessy v. Ferguson court case and legacy.

New York Times Summer Reading Contest Week 10: Foundation is Dead

Kristen Bateman’s “Foundation is Dead” causes me mixed feelings. On the one hand, strong women coming out and accepting their imperfections is so refreshing to me. On the other hand, Bateman’s article seems to be projecting that body-image issues are non-existent in this era. 

I have acne. Since my journey to body-positivity began, I’ve begun to come to terms with it. Still, I have issues with the way I see myself. 

I despise my blemishes. I soak them in chemicals and stab at them aggressively, and yet, they persist. Even a reminder of my pimples leaves me cowering in a corner in shame. Being a natural bodily and hormonal issue, my response may seem confusing to the outsider. But the stigma connected to acne has caused insecurities among much of the population.

I hate my body. My face isn’t quite gaunt enough. My neck and waist have lingering rolls. I hide my muffin top under high-rise pants. I abhor my thick thighs and wide forearms. I try to starve myself, but continue to gorge myself on junk out of surrender. It’s hard to explain my self-deprecating feelings to my 90-pound friends.

I don’t know when my self-hate will end. What I do know, however, is that self-content takes time and discipline to reach. Not everyone is able to accept themselves after accepting the accessibility and ease of a task, like forgoing effort of applying foundation.

I’m still working to overcome my body issues. But I can accept knowing that people out there are relinquishing the masks they hide behind.

New York Times Summer Reading Contest Week 9: Single Mega Millions Ticket Wins $1.34 Billion as Jackpot Grows

Christine Hauser’s article “Single Mega Millions Ticket Wins $1.34 Billion as Jackpot Grows” details the successes of the winners of the recent Mega Millions jackpot, as well as particulars about the lottery process and the outcomes – both dire and breathtakingly wonderful.

As light-hearted a topic this article revolves around, once a more incisive look is taken into the subject, the content of this article leaves a bit of a bitter taste in your mouth.

To put it into the simplest of terms: people out there are living astonishingly impoverished lives while likely middle-class people are winning big bucks with frivolous means. One may argue that the U.S.’ poverty rate is a staggering 11.4 percent, with a poverty threshold of 12,760 dollars. And yet, Nigeria, Africa’s most financially well-off country, has a poverty rate of 40.1 percent. Is the difference not already astoundingly clear? Some change must be made to the U.S.’ so-called “lotto culture”. 

Hauser notes, “The odds of winning the jackpot were long, one in 303 million.” Accordingly, the U.S. population is 329.5 million. As vague as we can be, it’s still obvious the chances of an impoverished person winning the lotto is one in a million… or rather, one in three hundred three million.

This leads us to an argument about the American attitude regarding poverty in the U.S. Most disregard their born social class and trumpet hard work for success. 

We need to look past ourselves and towards U.S. poverty. Enough said.

New York Times Summer Reading Contest Week 2: Why So Many Children of Immigrants Rise to the Top

In “Why So Many Children of Immigrants Rise to the Top” by Peter Coy, Professors Ran Abramitzky and Leah Boustan observe two reasons why immigrants’ children tend to outdo their peers: “First, the children [have]  an easy time outdoing parents whose careers were inhibited by poor language skills… Second, immigrants [tend] to settle in parts of the country experiencing strong job growth.”

My parents immigrated to the U.S. from China in 1995. As the child of immigrants, I’ve grown up with the idea of success from hard work pounded into my head; from five years old, I’ve had a lot of pressure put on me to achieve greatness in academics and all else. I’ve tried  my best to make my parents proud, reaching their high standards.

It was off-putting to read this article when I can relate to it. But it’s almost as if the professionals cited are disregarding everything my parents have done for me. It’s like, suddenly, my parents abandoning their previous lives, building themselves up from rock bottom, working hard every day for me and my siblings, doesn’t matter. My parents built me a strong foundation to achieve success and have educated me how. It’s not having better language skills than immigrants or “professional credentials”, or settling somewhere with “strong job growth”. It’s the mindset every immigrant must carry: Work hard every day to achieve true success. 

Immigrants come from tough situations. They’ve sometimes dealt with poverty. They know the merit in working hard to escape.

Eigth Amendment Analysis

In this day and age, most people take their freedom for granted. In the 21st century, lack of freedom of religion or permission of slavery is near unthinkable, and concerns many people every single say. A constitutional right that does not concern most people is prohibition of excessive fines and bail and cruel and unusual punishment. This is covered by the Eighth Amendment, which states that “Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.” This constitutional right only concerns those in court, facing fines due to crimes they committed, or those on the death row. For this reason, many people question why the Eighth Amendment was even established. When the Constitution was first preparing to be signed, many new American citizens were worried that under a new government, their natural rights wouldn’t be addressed. Hence, the Bill of Rights was written, and the Eighth Amendment was one of the first constitutional  rights ratified. In 1791, when the Eighth Amendment was first adopted, people weren’t able to pay to get out of prison because the judges set the bail too high, and there were strange, diabolical punishments such as public floggings which were deemed cruel and unusual. For this reason, the Eighth Amendment was written.

The Eighth Amendment is a very important part of the Bill of Rights. It ensures that criminals being prosecuted will be punished fairly and in a way proportional to their crime: For example, if someone committed petty theft of a 5 dollar bag of chips, but was fined for a whopping 600 dollars, they could be protected by the Eighth Amendment. Most people interpret the Eighth Amendment as prohibiting punishment disproportionate to their crime, as well as punishments involving torture and intentional inflicting of pain. However, some high-standing court officials have interpreted this in different ways: they say that the standards of cruelty when the Eighth Amendment was adopted should be the standard of determining whether a punishment is cruel today. This challenges the Eighth Amendment, or at least challenges the current interpretation of the Eighth Amendment, because at the time, the standard of punishment was very low. People were flogged and beaten in public. They also said the clause only prohibits barbaric punishment, not disproportionate punishment and that it does not prohibit death penalty, because capital punishment was permissed in 1791. These court justices also said that modern methods of punishment that did not exist in 1791 may violate the clause if they are designed to inflict pain. Other than some who disagree with parts of the Eighth Amendment, the Eighth Amendment wasn’t challenged much at all. Although American culture has a stigma against criminals, they seem to support the Eighth Amendment prohibiting cruel and unusual punishment.

Even though the Eighth Amendment hasn’t been challenged much since its ratification, it has experienced many developments, and has impacted other people. For example, in 1972, in the Supreme Court Case Furman v. Georgia, the Supreme Court deemed that Georgia’s law condoning the death penalty violated the Eighth Amendment. This ended many states’ death penalty, until 35 of these many states drafted new death penalty laws under which judges and juries were given factors to decide the appropriateness of the death penalty. This occurred in 1976 under Gregg v. Georgia. The Supreme Court also decided under Ingraham v. Wright (1977) that the Eighth Amendment only applied to punishment of criminal offenses, not the corporal punishment of students. This affected many students throughout their educations after fighting to escape corporal punishment in schools which was sometimes extreme. While our moral compasses disagree, students were ruled not protected by the Eighth Amendment. In Hutto v. Finney in 1978, the Supreme Court found Arkansas’ practice of isolating prisoners for 30 days cruel and unusual, but bases it on the circumstance of not how long the prisoners are isolated, but the conditions in the prisons. The Eighth Amendment has gone through a lot of deliberation in Supreme Court cases, and has gone through many changes.

One of the biggest controversies regarding this amendment is execution of minors. Many people have deemed this cruel and unusual punishment and a violation of the Eighth Amendment because minors are charged differently in court. Henceforth, in 2005, in Roper v. Simmons, the death penalty was ruled cruel and unusual punishment for those 17 and younger.  This is very recent news and a very recent development of this amendment and has applied greatly to minors in recent years.